When monarch meets mistress: What The Queen REALLY thought of Camilla

Three years had passed since Elizabeth had acknowledged her son’s mistress, at a sixtieth birthday party for former King Constantine of Greece, hosted by Charles at Highgrove. Their encounter was deliberate on Elizabeth’s part.

Charles remained firm in his insistence that Camilla was an essential element of his life; a diligent Mark Bolland had devoted considerable energy to achieving public acceptance of their relationship, including careful press leaks and equally careful picture opportunities.

Read Also: Meghan Markle, Prince Harry allegedly disliked by many Black people

In meeting Camilla, Elizabeth acknowledged the relationship; she was encouraged by members of her staff and her family, including her niece Sarah Chatto. She went no further. Palace staff described her policy as ‘acknowledging but not accepting’ Camilla.

A courtier labeled their exchange at Highgrove ‘very brief, very formal’; one of Charles’s staff described it as ‘merely a cracking of the ice rather than a breaking of it’.

Read Also: Meghan Markle hid her 30-pound weight gain by wearing thick clothes in NYC: Rumor

As so often, Elizabeth’s motives balanced public and private concerns: she cared for Charles’s happiness, although she could not understand his decision to jeopardize the monarchy’s stability in pursuit of self-fulfillment.

Her outlook bore the imprint of the abdication, especially while her mother was alive; the success of her own marriage gave fewer grounds for empathy.

Read Also: Queen Elizabeth Going Bankrupt?
Deliberately uncontroversial herself, she recognized the extent to which Charles’ private life continued to polarise opinions. In the short term, the meeting between monarch and mistress at Highgrove made easier a more public role for Camilla in Charles’s life. Elizabeth, as so often, proceeded cautiously.

Loftily the palace dismissed as speculation claims in The Spectator in August 2001 that Elizabeth had agreed to Charles and Camilla’s marriage. The magazine quoted a ‘well-informed Palace observer’ saying that Elizabeth ‘accept[ed] that the last great thing she has to do in her reign is to sort out the relationship between Charles and Camilla, and in practice, that means to smile on a marriage’.

Read Also: Prince Harry close to tears during the final royal engagement, the book says

Of course, Elizabeth realized that the monarchy’s wellbeing demanded a solution for a relationship that had already caused so much damage; she would take time to agree to the marriage. Elizabeth did not dislike Camilla, who, more than Diana, shared her own country interests and brisk, wry outlook.

In June, she made possible Camilla’s first public appearance alongside the royal family, when Camilla was invited to both Golden Jubilee concerts; she also invited her to the family dinner she held at the Ritz following the jubilee’s success.

Read Also: Doting Prince Harry rocks daughter Lilibet Diana to sleep reveals insider

Elizabeth was aware of opinions like those expressed in a Panorama documentary in October, that found only 42 percent of people in favor of the couple’s marriage and 52 percent opposed to Camilla becoming queen.

Unnervingly for Elizabeth, the recently retired vicar of Tetbury, close to Highgrove, presented Charles’s predicament as a revisiting of Uncle David’s unhappy dilemma: ‘I think that Charles has got to make a decision on where his duty lies. Does it lie with the woman he undoubtedly loves? Does it lie with his position as a future monarch?

Read Also: Meghan Markle, Prince Harry ‘continually invade their privacy’: Report

As supreme governor of the Church of England, and a woman of deep faith who shared her parents’ belief in the sanctity of marriage, Elizabeth could not easily discount clerical opinion. She could, however, seek guidance. Both George Carey and his successor as Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, supported Charles and Camilla’s marriage; Williams advised against a religious ceremony as divisive among Anglican clergy.

At Sandringham at Christmas in 2004, Elizabeth agreed to Charles’s remarriage. Months before, a message tied to railings at Kensington Palace for the seventh anniversary of Diana’s death, had read ‘No to Queen Camilla.’

Read Also: Kate Middleton ‘didn’t have the energy to bond with Meghan Markle’ new book claims

Elizabeth did not attend the civil marriage ceremony in Windsor’s Guildhall on 9 April 2005. She and Philip were among the congregation of more than 700 in St George’s Chapel for the subsequent service of prayer and dedication.

As on other occasions, her decision acknowledged the claims of traditional orthodoxies and her position not simply as a mother but the established church’s supreme governor.

Behind closed doors, in the castle’s state apartments, Elizabeth was notably cheerful at the reception she hosted for Charles and his new Duchess of Cornwall, and in June, she and Philip accompanied Charles and Camilla to William’s graduation ceremony in St Andrews.

Read Also: Prince Harry, Meghan Markle Having Second Non-Royal Wedding In California?

At last, was an opportunity for respite from family troubles. Testaments to family harmony peppered extensive celebrations of Elizabeth’s eightieth birthday, beginning the following spring. Elizabeth’s updating of the Order of Precedence ‘on blood principles’ gave prominence to her closest relations: neither her daughter Anne nor her cousin Alexandra was required to curtsey to Camilla in Charles’s absence.

No Comments Yet

Comments are closed